Banksy draws fire over Glastonbury protest

Banksy’s Refugee Boat protest at Glastonbury drew fire from a number of corners of the political and media spectrum. Across the board it was evident that everyone missed the point.

The raft (containing dummies and emblazoned with an iconic image) was launched into the crowd during the Idles song Danny Nedelko. No one, including the band, knew this was initiated by Banksy.

In this, the audience becomes an unwitting participant as the raft is ‘body surfed’ over the heads of the crowd who clearly think that this is part of the bands performance.

It was denounced as ‘vile’ by the British Home Secretary and branded as ‘middle class self indulgence’ and ‘tasteless lazy liberalism’ by MSM. However for my money it appears that Banksy hit the target, viz public and political sentiment around the issue of ‘boat people’ and ‘asylum seekers’ at point blank range.

Have we, the public, become the unwitting means by which the media and political machinations ensure that the issue of asylum and those seeking it, is an issue forever circulating in the divisive realms of ‘personal opinion’ and public speculation, dooming those who seek to escape various dire situations and risk their lives undertaking perilous journeys in overloaded and often less than sea worthy vessels only to die at sea or face an often hostile reception or incarceration on reaching their destination.

Image @ Independent Media

Lest we forget Internet freedom

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Just in case I ever forget why thousands of people took a stand.

As a musician/songwriter, artist and photographer I can understand that there is a legitimate need for measures to protect property rights. However SOPA and PIPA legislations that are currently on the table, appear to be far to broad in their terms of reference to be free from abuse. It’s a basic human failing; hence, ‘give an inch, take a mile’. Sometimes it appears that lawmakers and legislators just don’t get it. Where they, (in most cases) appear to see an issue that needs some kind of action; instead of weighing all arguments carefully and devising an approach that is even handed, effective and free of gray areas that are far to interpretive, they fly in with a napalm mentality that takes out everything in it’s path, including the innocent. This is what bothers me about the current situation. There’s a lot of valid talk about inhibiting genuine development and innovation in many of area of enterprise on the web and these concerns need to be taken seriously, however the bigger players, whom the legislations are purportedly designed to snare will probably just bunker in behind more sophisticated defenses and some kid who didn’t read the fine print or even know about it will do something innocuous, thoughtless or risky and spend years behind bars for it and we’ll be expected to read that as a measure of the incredible success of the law.

I think that Forbes covered most of the issues quite succinctly here